If I hold legal title to anything at all it shows that I am an owner of that thing at least in part and the ownership of people is slavery regardless of semantics "a rose by any other designation".
The resulting "person" is an agent of the municipal corporation, a trust corporation, an extension of the municipal corporation and is therefore subject to the rules and regulations of that corporation in the same way any employee is.
The Municipal Corporations Act 1882 shows that anyone charged with a public duty however designated is a trustee, an employee, an underling which does as it is told, is commanded to act and when it disobeys an order is punished.
The courts attached to these municipal corporations are the arbitrary departments for it, they are inferior courts and are known as such even in law, it is the corporations own court which is used to punish and sanction it's employee's or sister corporations into compliance, it is an employment tribunal for naughty, lazy or disobedient slaves.
What they never tell you is that you have equitable title to this person once you claim it and equity in theory always trumps any legal claim, you are not the trustee, you are the beneficiary, the trust and estate created was based upon your life and as such it is you whom issues the orders as you are the beneficiary. The state is abandoning it's position as a public trustee and attempting to have you fill that hole or role through ignorance and if you do accept that you are the trustee you abandon your position as the beneficiary and at this point the state fills the position you abandoned and becomes the executor, now the roles are reversed and you become the public trustee.
The state is answerable to the people in a democracy, the problem with a democracy it seems is that the only recourse the people have is to vote people out whom they voted in based upon a pack of lies and they have to wait 5 years to do it, by this time the damage is done. To vote is to agree, so no matter which party wins and whether you voted for them or not you have agreed to play the game win or lose.
The government is a legal government and so legal definitions apply when referencing it and the legal definition of the word "representative" in just about every statute I have read means: the executor or administrator for a deceased entity; or in this case "entities".
A corporation is incorporeal, it lacks material form and has no life and therefore it is a deceased entity, the government is the administrator for corporations and that is why Stephen Byers MP described himself and his office as "a taxi for hire" for corporate interests whom can pay for that privilege of having statutes drawn up which suit them solely, can you ?
They call it "lobbying" but there already exists a term for this form of government and it's called Fascism and so that is what I call it, again "a rose by any other designation".
Do you feel like the state is answerable to you in any way, or is your experience of the state that it coerces performance by way of threats and intimidation ? The state has no business meddling in private matters, choices, habits, perspectives, beliefs or expression of any of the former in a free society but then that is not what Britain is.
It is a monarchy and a monarchy has subjects and subjects are slaves, slavery was never abolished it was merely redefined to incorporate all people regardless of race of the so called lower and middle classes. During the 14th Century under an openly feudal system the tenants of the land lords had to pay a tithe in taxes, one tenth of what they produced went to the land lord and they retained the other 90% of their production, of their own labour. Today you probably pay, when all taxation is accounted for between 70-80% of what you earn on taxes, serfs payed a tithe and so the condition of a serf from the 14th Century is a better condition then that of a so called citizen or "person" today in 2013.
The Crown Lands Act 1702 clearly shows that the CROWN was bankrupt and unable to support it's government and shows in the text that the subjects estates would be held on trust to fulfill the function of government, which in turn shows that we, the people, are the creditors for the CROWN and not the debtor, the beneficiaries, not the trustee's.
For more information and direct quotes from statute see http://www.
Based upon what I have stated above and more I created an affidavit which I called "an affidavit of the life of the living man" making my claim against the person and showing that I am the living man whom this estate is based upon, that I was living when I was evicted from that estate and as such have the right to reclaim the entire trust as the beneficiary from any malfeasant trustee's now trespassing on my estate, that I am a living man, I am not lost at sea and so had returned to state my claim as the beneficiary.
It was in essence a maritime lien as well as an affidavit, it was written by hand not printed and it was served directly to the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice offices at the MOJ and the Courts Of Chancery, not by post and was witnessed by other people and receipts taken and it was not rebutted after 90 days, there to this day has never been an attempt at rebuttal and so it stands as the truth in law and a true bill in commerce by operation of law.
I further sent the same affidavit to the municipal corporation which was the trustee for my estate and I did receive a response this time. The affidavit was returned to me without the UK and without any attached title and the document was stamped by the municipal corporation under it's seal as "received" which means "accepted" in law, so I now hold a contract which shows my equitable right as the beneficiary to all value in the trust as agreed by the trustee's.
Moving on now to something I want to say about my experiences with people I have been involved with, people whom I helped and taught who are betraying the ethos of the movement as I see it and in the most cynical way.
For me "the truth," whatever that actually is should not be sold as a product, corporate logos and the desire to benefit from the ignorance of others is abhorrent, it is what they do, it is the problem not the solution, you cannot defeat your enemy by becoming your enemy as someone once said truly.
In the beginning a friend whom became a colleague of mine told me of a video on Google by a man called Robert Menard. We at the time were scouring the internet for something inspiring, I knew that people were slaves the day I realised that you really had no choice when the alarm bell rang in the morning. To give you some perspective we were trying to to build a Joe Cell at the time, researching Stan Meyer and others like him motivated by the prospect of installing Joe Cells into standard cars and with others inspire a new age of cooperation which would embarrass the government and show how pointless and irrelevant governments are, or have become.
Then I watched Robert's video and I dropped everything, just the legal definitions of the terms "person" and "human being" blew my mind and it could be cross referenced easily which inspired me. The problem with many movements is that they are spurious and what I mean by that is that there is next to no facts presented to back up the claims some, most of these people make.
You may come across something interesting but by the time you have scrolled to the bottom of the page you see that this man who believes in whatever conspiracy he believes in, also believes in dragons, werewolves and the tooth fairy, but this video was straight to the point and remained to the point and so thank you Robert.
Then there was Irene Gravenhorst, thorough, brave, diligent and completely inspiring. When we watched the first of her videos on YOUTUBE I had to watch it back 3 or 4 times just to get my head around the way she introduced herself to public trustees, amazing, thank you Irene. Winston Shrout and the UCC tech came next and although Winston is brilliant in his own right and extremely knowledgeable in certain fields I was not prepared to get into a contractual agreement with WASHINGTON DC and the military industrial complex, I wasn't even sure how applicable it was being that I am in England whereas others I was in the company of at the time filed UCC1 financing statements based upon Winston's work and entered courts here attempting to use it.
Every day they would tell me that I needed to file my UCC1 and every day I told them that there was a way to it through English law and that I was going to find that way. In the end, after 18 months I devised a way to make my claim as a UCC1 is in essence a maritime lien and so I turned my attention to The Merchant Shipping Act 1894, the Municipal Corporations Act 1882, all the trustees Acts and other relevant acts back to 1666, it took a long time.
My colleagues were telling me I was wrong all of the time, that the UCC1 was the only way and just one of my colleagues, who was also a childhood friend had time for me but his input was enough to push me over the line.
For the best part of three years we were working nearly everyday on different claims for different people including our own, everything I have done for others I have done free of charge, I don't want to give fish, I want to provide the means to fish and so whatever I know I let everyone else see freely and I believe that if we had all done this then our collective cause would have been advanced, but as it stands what I see is a group of individuals attempting to bottle and label the truth under their own corporate logos for mass consumption and at a price, just like every other corporate entity.
For these individuals the irony of on one hand entering a court whilst claiming that there is no money, siting the Bills Of Exchange Act 1882 and the statements of Lord Denning whilst on the other hand asking people to pay money to hear the truth, is absolutely and completely lost on them and if it is not and they see this irony, then they are no more than hypocrites. I have been unlucky enough to have been taken in by an individual whom used his weakness as his strength and when he was abandoned by everyone else in my group I kept him informed because I felt pity for this person and yes, because of the way he operates he is a person. He had no means to find the information as he had no internet connection and so I allowed him to copy my files onto a memory stick to learn from my studies. I wanted to hold seminars a long time ago but both this person and my other colleagues would tell me that if I did that and someone else got through the door (and what they meant by that was to have the bond monetised) it would be slammed in our faces making all of our work a waste of time. I had stand up arguments with all of them and told them that the state will never honour the bond, that they would never get payed and the most we could do was to keep being right but the person I speak of was the individual who made the most noise, he had contributed the least but spoke the most. So I didn't create a web page I just helped those around me, anyone I could help I have done without charge on principle and then a while ago this person called me and asked if I would like to be a guest speaker at his seminars which he would be charging people to attend, whilst using my material which would really give me nothing to speak about, he was asking permission to take credit for my work and to have me spectate his imagined rise to fame off of my back.
To go into too much more and trust me, there are lot's more detail would be vindictive, calculated and would take me further away from the man I am on the path to becoming, it would make me like him and so enough has been said with regard to that person but the point remains relevant and the point, not the person is why I am writing this.
The only thing I want is for those who learn from what I or others have found is to have the common decency to not attempt to plagiarise the author as though it were their own work and charge people for that knowledge or perspective when as it is I give it freely and to merely say, "Steve/Billy showed me, visit this site" that is it, I don't want cash, you won't see my face on YOUTUBE, I won't advertise any products, or charge you subscription rates I am simply asking those who produce documents to the state claiming that as the people are the creditors that the credit should be returned to them as the principals, to remain consistent in their arguments and acts and to actually live by the standard which they set for others and the state and to not consistently fall short of this mark, a mark which they set.
Truth is a temple and those that trade in the temple are defacing the house of God, I am not a practicing Catholic although I was raised as one, I believe that Jesus was telling me that he and I are the son's of God, we are all like God in some aspects especially creativity, everything is one, some say they know this although they operate as though everything is separate, like a corporation does, don't be a person be a man.
